Research on Methodologies for Fostering Equity in Secondary Education in Urban and Rural in Contemporary China
Abstract
Currently, education inequities are prevalent in the domain of secondary education within China, manifested in the marked discrepancies in educational opportunities, an uneven distribution of educational resources, and a discernible lack of investment in educational infrastructure in rural localities. From the perspective of promoters and leaders of educational policy, this study delves into a meticulous examination of the projects undertaken by local welfare organizations in the context of rural secondary schools within Hunan Province, China. The intent is to dissect the tangible impacts of these endeavors and to probe into the root causes of the education inequities within these rural secondary schools. The paper underscores the paramount requirement of education equity—ensuring that every student, irrespective of their socioeconomic background, geographic location, or familial financial standing, has equal access to premium educational resources. Furthermore, the document cautions against the perils of adopting a "binary opposition" mindset—one that merely ascribes the equities between urban and rural educational systems to a lack of resources or policies. Instead, it advocates for a more holistic, profound, and nuanced analytical framework that involves immersive fieldwork, comprehensive understanding, and integration into the educational service landscape to accurately navigate and respond to the intricacies and dynamics of the educational milieu. Finally, in the quest of formulating a viable and effective model for education equity, it is imperative to align with local realities and to leverage comprehensive data and resources.
References
- Cloete, N., & Moja, T. (2005). Transformation Tensions in Higher Education: Equity, Efficiency, and Development. Social Research, 72(3), 693–722. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40971787
- Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly; 44(5), 635-674. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1177/0013161X08321509
- Li Gang. (2020). Promoting the fair development of urban and rural compulsory education more accurately. People's Education (20), 31-34.
- Guo Shaoqing & Hua Xiaoyu.(2023). Research on the path of Promoting urban and rural education equity through digital transformation of education. Journal of the National Academy of Educational Administration (04),37-46+95.
- NIELSEN, N. (2013). Education, Equity, and the Big Picture. Issues in Science and Technology, 29(3), 76–82. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43315744
- State General Administration of Sport. Bulletin of the Sixth National Sports Venue Survey Data [EB/OL]. (2014-12-26) [2022-09-30]. https:/ /www.sport.gov.cn/n4/n210/n218/c328625/content. html.
- Levin, B. (2012). Greater equity in education. The Phi Delta Kappan, 93(7), 74–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23210013
- Chinese government website. Outline of the National Medium - and Long-Term Education Policy Reform and Development Plan (2010-2020) [EB/OL]. 2010-(c)07-29) [2022-09-17]. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2010-07/29/content_1667143.htm.
- Introduction of Qi Zhi School House in PEER projects for pre-college http://peerchina.org/projects/pre-college/2019i/
- Qin, Yuyou & Li, Shengbin.(2010). American Class Size reduction Project: Orientation and discussion. Foreign Education Research (11),70-76.
- Li Chenran.(2021). Is class size Reduction Reform Effective? (master degree thesis, Nanjing Normal University. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27245/d.cnki.gnjsu.2021.002647doi:10.27245/d.cnki.gnjsu.2021.002647.
- Zhang L L, Shi Y & Hu Y M. (2022). Trends and characteristics of school-age population in urban and rural areas from 2021 to 2035: A forecast based on the data of the 7th National Population Census. Educational Research (12),101-112.