Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.40> Article
Research Article

Exploring the Impact of Gamification on STEM Learning in Education: The Mediating Role of Facilitating Focus

Wanting SuThe Chinese University of Hong Kong*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of gamification on STEM Learning in education, the mediating role of promotion focus, and the moderating role of teacher guidance. A sample of 385 college students majoring in computer science across different colleges in Jiangsu Province who experienced gamification in their curriculum was surveyed. The data were collected using questionnaires designed to measure gamification in education, STEM Learning outcomes, the level of promotion focus, and the degree of teacher guidance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good discriminant validity (χ^2 = 596.165, df = 260, χ^2/df = 2.293, RMSEA = 0.056, CFI = 0.922, IFI = 0.924). Positive correlations were found between Gamification Engagement, Facilitative Focus, and STEM Learning in Education (Self-report & Teacher Evaluation). Hypothesis testing indicated gamification's direct effect on STEM Learning (γ=0.814, p<0.01), mediation by promotion focus (effect value 0.072, 95% CI [0.002, 0.155]), and moderation by teacher guidance (effect value 0.130, 95% CI [0.074, 0.156]). Gamification directly enhances STEM Learning and can be further optimized through teacher-guided promotion focus. To maximize gamification's impact, teachers should balance it with traditional methods and stimulate positive learning motivation among students. Thus, incorporating gamification, reinforcing teacher guidance, and nurturing a promotion-focused learning environment are key for optimal educational outcomes.

Keywords: gamification; STEM Learning; promotion focus; teacher guidance; learning outcomes
Published: September 27, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/40/20242263
Volume: CHR Vol.40
pp. 179-188
Download PDF

References

  1. M. F. Zguir, S. Dubis, and M. Koç, "Embedding Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and SDGs values in curriculum: A comparative review on Qatar, Singapore and New Zealand," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 319, p. 128534, 2021.
  2. A. Ben-Eliyahu, "Sustainable learning in education," Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 8, p. 4250, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13084250.
  3. K. Froehle, A. R. Phillips, and H. Murzi, "Lifelong learning is an ethical responsibility of professional engineers: Is school preparing young engineers for lifelong learning?," Journal of Civil Engineering Education, vol. 147, no. 3, p. 02521002, 2021.
  4. L.-K. Ng and C.-K. Lo, "Flipped classroom and gamification approach: Its impact on performance and academic commitment on sustainable learning in education," Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 5428, 2022.
  5. S. W. Kozlowski and B. S. Bell, "Team learning, development, and adaptation," in Work group learning: Psychology Press, 2007, pp. 39-68.
  6. C. Chapman, P. Armstrong, A. Harris, D. Muijs, D. Reynolds, and P. Sammons, School effectiveness and improvement research, policy and practice: Challenging the orthodoxy? Routledge, 2012.
  7. R. W. M. Mee et al., "A Conceptual Model of Analogue Gamification to Enhance Learners' Motivation and Attitude," International Journal of Language Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 40-50, 2021.
  8. A. Marougkas, C. Troussas, A. Krouska, and C. Sgouropoulou, "Virtual Reality in Education: A Review of Learning Theories, Approaches and Methodologies for the Last Decade," Electronics, vol. 12, no. 13, p. 2832, 2023.
  9. S. Bennani, A. Maalel, and H. Ben Ghezala, "Adaptive gamification in E‐learning: A literature review and future challenges," Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 628-642, 2022.
  10. S. Bai, K. F. Hew, D. E. Gonda, B. Huang, and X. Liang, "Incorporating fantasy into gamification promotes student learning and quality of online interaction," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1-26, 2022.
  11. K. W. Lau and P. Y. Lee, "The use of virtual reality for creating unusual environmental stimulation to motivate students to explore creative ideas," Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 3-18, 2015.
  12. W. Scott and P. Vare, Learning, environment and sustainable development: A history of ideas. Routledge, 2020.
  13. A. N. Saleem, N. M. Noori, and F. Ozdamli, "Gamification applications in E-learning: A literature review," Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 139-159, 2022.
  14. R. Kusurkar, T. J. Ten Cate, M. Van Asperen, and G. Croiset, "Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: a review of the literature," Medical teacher, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. e242-e262, 2011.
  15. M. Papi, A. V. Bondarenko, S. Mansouri, L. Feng, and C. Jiang, "Rethinking L2 motivation research: The 2× 2 model of L2 self-guides," Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 337-361, 2019.
  16. M. E. Sousa‐Vieira, J. C. López‐Ardao, M. Fernández‐Veiga, and R. F. Rodríguez‐Rubio, "Study of the impact of social learning and gamification methodologies on learning results in higher education," Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 131-153, 2023.
  17. C. Dichev, D. Dicheva, G. Angelova, and G. Agre, "From gamification to gameful design and gameful experience in learning," Cybernetics and information technologies, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 80-100, 2014.
  18. D. Dicheva, K. Irwin, and C. Dichev, "Exploring learners experience of gamified practicing: For learning or for fun?," International Journal of Serious Games, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5-21, 2019.
  19. R. Kladchuen and J. Srisomphan, "The synthesis of a model of problem-based learning with the gamification concept to enhance the problem-solving skills for high vocational certificate," International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), vol. 16, no. 14, p. 4, 2021.
  20. S. E. Seibert, M. L. Kraimer, and P. A. Heslin, "Developing career resilience and adaptability," Organizational Dynamics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 245-257, 2016.
  21. P. J. Collier and D. L. Morgan, "Community service through facilitating focus groups: The case for a methods-based service-learning course," Teaching Sociology, pp. 185-199, 2002.
  22. S. Wilcox, "Fostering self-directed learning in the university setting," Studies in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 165-176, 1996.
  23. R. Kark and D. Van Dijk, "Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes," Academy of management review, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 500-528, 2007.
  24. A. Van Leeuwen and J. Janssen, "A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education," Educational Research Review, vol. 27, pp. 71-89, 2019.
  25. A. C. M. Leung, R. Santhanam, R. C.-W. Kwok, and W. T. Yue, "Could gamification designs enhance online learning through personalization? Lessons from a field experiment," Information Systems Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 27-49, 2023. A. Bandura, "Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning," Educational psychologist, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 117-148, 1993.
  26. A. Bandura, "Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning," Educational psychologist, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 117-148, 1993.
  27. R. Costello, "Gamification Strategies for Retention, Motivation, and Engagement in Higher Education: Emerging Research and Opportunities: Emerging Research and Opportunities," 2020.