Research Article

The Symbolization of Violence Aesthetic and Cultural Integration in One Piece: A Case Study of the Thriller Bark Chapter

Siyuan LuUniversity of Shanghai for Science and Technology*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Postmodernism in the 20th century gradually developed "violence" into an artistic aesthetic, and due to different understandings of "violence" in various countries, it has spawned a variety of branches. In order to disseminate its works to audiences from different cultural backgrounds, One Piece combines Japanese indigenous violence aesthetics with the violent cultures of various cultures, making it a successful example of cross-cultural communication on a global scale. To understand the process of symbolic re-encoding of Japanese native violence aesthetics and British violence aesthetics in One Piece, as well as the way in which values are integrated, this study selects the Thriller Bark Chapter (episodes 337 to 380) in One Piece as a case for analysis. The study extracts references to British culture and Japanese native culture within the text as "cultural symbols," a unit of visual analysis, and further divides them into four major categories: natural symbols, artificial symbols, character symbols, and language symbols. Statistical analysis reveals that, due to the close relationship between British horror violence culture and the development of its Gothic literature, the author has incorporated a large number of Gothic cultural symbols in the Thriller Bark Chapter. Meanwhile, the work consistently upholds the fundamental principles of Japanese native culture while also revitalizing its own cultural identity.

Keywords: One Piece; violence aesthetics; symbolization; intercultural
Published: September 27, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/40/20242278
Volume: CHR Vol.40
pp. 157-164
Download PDF

References

  1. Zhang Shujin. On the Nature and Aesthetic Meaning of "Aesthetics of Violence"[J]. Contemporary Cinema,2010(10):103-109.
  2. Zhu Lixin. The Aesthetics of Japanese Science Fiction Animation under the Collision of Aesthetics[J]. Modern Communication(Journal of Communication University of China),2022,44(03):117-124.DOI:10.19997/j.cnki.xdcb.2022.03.010.
  3. Haiyan Zhang. Multicultural Interpretation of the Anime "King of Thieves"[J]. Journal of Shanxi Datong University (Social Science Edition),2019,33(05):78-81.
  4. Fan Hong,Su Shin. Strategic Communication of National Image and Cultural Symbol System - An Examination Based on the Practice of Japanese Cultural Symbol Communication[J]. Modern Communication(Journal of Communication University of China),2022,44(06):77-86.DOI:10.19997/j.cnki.xdcb.2022.06.019.
  5. Chang Yanrong. On three modes of intercultural communication [J]. Journal of Hunan University (Social Science Edition),2003(03):100-103.
  6. He Songbei. The realistic origin of fear in gothic literature[J]. Science and Technology Information,2010(28):196+199.
  7. Wang Zhen. Research on the tradition of British and American Gothic literature[J]. Journal of Changchun Normal University,2017,36(07):131-133.
  8. Bi Fang. The "Fog City" Hat Removal: The 1952 London Smog Incident[J]. China Disaster Reduction, 2021(8):30-35. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-4549.2021.08.007.
  9. Zhang, Xiaoli. Theme Analysis of Nineteenth Century British Vampire Literature[J]. Journal of Hubei Second Normal College,2015,32(05):5-7.
  10. Shao Xiaotang. The Shaping of Western Classical Cultural Symbols from the Changes of Vampire Image in Literary Narratives[J]. Western Journal,2022(20):41-44.DOI:10.16721/j.cnki.cn61-1487/c.2022.20.010.
  11. Wang JH. Cultural integration and cultural self-awareness under cross-cultural communication[J]. Heilongjiang Social Science,2007(02):101-103.
  12. Fu Zhenxing. On the Cultural Mixture and Cross-cultural Communication Strategy of American Animation [D]. Central China Normal University,2010.
  13. Ruth Benedict: The Chrysanthemum and the Knife (Updated Edition), Translated by Lu Wanhe, Beijing: Commercial Press, 2012.
  14. Yang Qingyu. Japanese gangster films under the cultural aesthetic perspective[J]. Film Literature,2018(14):58-60.
  15. Steve Mortensen, edited by Steve Mortensen, Intercultural Communication: An Eastern Perspective, translated by Guan Shijie and Hu Xing, Beijing: China Social Science Press, 1999 ed.