Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.45> Article
Research Article

The United States Abortion Controversy in the Context of Institutional Rivalry: The Interweaving of Justice, Politics, and Policy

Zheng YuanUniversity of Malaya*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper delves into the decades-long debate on abortion rights in United States, pointing out that its roots lie in the contradictions within the United States system. These contradictions manifest themselves through three main conflicts: judicial, political, and policy. Judicial conflicts revolve around the question of whether constitutional privacy rights should extend to abortion, with typical cases encompassing the pivotal rulings of Roe v. Wade and Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. At the political level, the debate has been further exacerbated by bitter opposition between Republicans and Democrats, with opposing ideological positions on reproductive rights. Finally, the conflict between law and policy is reflected in the increasing polarization of abortion laws at the state level, leading to fragmentation of the national legal landscape. By analyzing these interrelated conflicts, this paper argues that the inherent contradictions within the United States system make the issue of abortion rights an ongoing and unresolved social issue.

Keywords: Abortion; fetal rights; Roe v. Wade; Dobbs v. Jackson; Women’s Health Organization
Published: September 27, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/45/20240105
Volume: CHR Vol.45
pp. 157-164
Download PDF

References

  1. Krause-Jackson, F. (2022, June 25). Key Biden allies in G-7 aghast at abortion rights reversal in US. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-24/key-biden-allies-in-g-7-aghast-at-abortion-rights-reversal-in-us.
  2. National Constitution Center. (n.d.). The Constitution: Amendments. Accessed August 11, 2024, from https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments.
  3. JUSTIA U.S. Supreme Court (1973), Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113. Accessed August 11, 2024, from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/.
  4. Supreme Court of the United States (2022), Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 142 S. Ct. 2228-2354. Accessed on August 11, 2024, from https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf.
  5. McGirr, L. (2015). Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  6. FitzGerald, F. (2017). The Evangelicals: The Struggle to Shape America. Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.
  7. Smith, G. S. (2006). Faith and the Presidency: From George Washington to George W. Bush. Oxford University Press.
  8. Herrera, A. (2018, December 4). Before he was president, H.W. Bush championed family planning. The World. https://theworld.org/stories/2018/12/05/george-hw-bush-supported-birth-control-yes-its-true.
  9. Guttmacher Institute. (2024, July). State bans on abortion throughout pregnancy. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-policies-abortion-bans (Accessed August 11, 2024).
  10. The White House. (2022, July 8). Fact sheet: President Biden to sign executive order protecting access to reproductive health care services. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/07/08/fact-sheet-president-biden-to-sign-executive-order-protecting-access-to-reproductive-health-care-services/.
  11. Congressional research service. (2022, July 8). Congressional authority to regulate abortion. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10787.