Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.40> Article
Research Article

Effects of Homophone Priming on the Decision-Making in Perceptual Color Recognition of Mandarin Speakers

Boyang LiWebb Schools of California*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study delves into the nuanced interactions between language, cognition, and perception by examining the impact of homophones on decision-making and perceptual color recognition among native Mandarin speakers. Drawing on theories of linguistic relativity and cognitive processing, this research hypothesized that homophonic primes would subtly influence both decision-making processes and color recognition tasks. Participants were assigned at random to surveys where they were unknowingly exposed to stimuli with and without homophonic primes before engaging in color recognition tasks involving subtle shade differentiations. Contrary to initial expectations, statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in decision-making accuracy between conditions, suggesting that homophones may not overtly affect conscious decision-making processes in our bilingual cohort. However, intriguing variations emerged in the perceptual color recognition task, where participants exposed to homophonic primes showed tendencies to perceive color shades more similarly compared to those in the control condition. This finding implies a potential cognitive load effect or subtle priming influence on perceptual categorization tied to linguistic structures. The implications of these findings challenge traditional views on language's role in shaping cognitive processes, highlighting the complexity of how linguistic structures such as homophones may operate at subconscious levels. The study contributes to ongoing debates in cognitive science and linguistics by underscoring the need for nuanced approaches to understanding cross-linguistic cognitive mechanisms. Future research should further explore the Whorfian hypothesis within bilingual contexts, considering additional variables such as language proficiency and cultural influences to elucidate the intricate relationship between language and cognition.

Keywords: Homophones; decision-making; color recognition; Mandarin speakers
Published: September 10, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/40/20242261
Volume: CHR Vol.40
pp. 88-99
Download PDF

References

  1. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). MIT Press.
  2. Davis, D. F., & Herr, P. M. (2014). From Bye to Buy: Homophones as a Phonological Route to Priming. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1063–1077. https://doi.org/10.1086/673960
  3. Yang, H., Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (2017). The role of character density in Mandarin word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(5), 743-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm000034
  4. Gleitman, L., & Papafragou, A. (2017). Language and thought. In E. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research, and Everyday Experience (4th ed., pp. 270-308). Cengage Learning.
  5. Slowiaczek, L. M., Nusbaum, H. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1987). Phonological Priming in Auditory Word Recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(1), 64–75. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3499951/
  6. Biedermann, B., Blanken, G., & Nickels, L. (2002). The representation of homophones: Evidence from remediation. Aphasiology, 16(10-11), 1115–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000545
  7. Adha, R., & Astri, A. (2020). Students’ ability in understanding homophone in English. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), 6(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v6i1.1884
  8. Rodd, J. M., Lopez Cutrin, B., Kirsch, H., Millar, A., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Long-term priming of the meanings of ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.08.002
  9. Simpson, G. B., & Burgess, C. (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 28–39.
  10. Simpson, G. B., & Krueger, M. (1991). Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 627–643.
  11. Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, Kathleen R. Varner, and Mark E. Faust(1990), “Investigating Differences in General Comprehension Skill,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Mem-ory, and Cognition, 16 (3), 430–45.
  12. Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, and Mark E. Faust (1991), “The Mech-anism of Suppression: A Component of General Comprehen-sion Skill,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition, 17 (2), 245–62.
  13. Kintsch, Walter (1988), “The Role of Knowledge in Discourse Comprehension: A Construction-Integration Model,” Psycho-logical Review, 95 (2), 163–82.
  14. Lukatela, Georgije, and Michael T. Turvey (1994a), “Visual LexicalAccess Is Initially Phonological. 1. Evidence from AssociativePriming by Words, Homophones, and Pseudohomophones,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123 (2),107–28.— (1994b), “Visual Lexical Access Is Initially Phonological.2. Evidence from Phonological Priming by Homophones andPseudohomophones,” Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 123 (4), 331–53.
  15. Inhoff, Albrecht W., Cynthia Connine, Briana Eiter, Ralph Radach, and Dieter Heller (2004), “Phonological Representation ofWords in Memory during Sentence Reading,” PsychonomicBulletin and Review, 11 (2), 320–35.
  16. James, L. E., & Burke, D. M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1378–1391. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1378
  17. Ledoux, K., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Syntactic Priming in Comprehension. Psychological Science, 18(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01863.x
  18. Thoma, D. (2023). Homophone priming. Osf.io. https://osf.io/6fvyw/
  19. Marslen-Wilson WD, Welsh A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology. 1978;10:29–63. [Google Scholar]
  20. Higgins, Edward T. (1996), “Knowledge Activation: Accessibility, Applicability, and Salience,” in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, ed. E. Tory Higgins and Arie W. Kruglanski, New York: Guilford Press, 133–68.
  21. Martin, R. C., & Jensen, C. R. (1988). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: A failure to replicate. Memory & Cognition, 16(6), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197052
  22. Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2014). How arbitrary is language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0299
  23. Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
  24. Reilly, J., Hung, J., & Westbury, C. (2016). Non-Arbitrariness in Mapping Word Form to Meaning: Cross-Linguistic Formal Markers of Word Concreteness. Cognitive Science, 41(4), 1071–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12361
  25. Shu H., Anderson R. C. (1997). Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children. Read. Res. Q. 32, 78–89. 10.1598/RRQ.32.1.5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen Y. P., Allport D. A., Marshall J. C. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: the stroke or the stroke pattern? Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 49A, 1024–1043. 10.1080/713755668 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuo, L.-J., Kim, T.-J., Yang, X., Li, H., Liu, Y., Wang, H., Hyun Park, J., & Li, Y. (2015). Acquisition of Chinese characters: the effects of character properties and individual differences among second language learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00986
  28. Xiao, H., Xu, C., & Rusamy, H. (2020). Pinyin Spelling Promotes Reading Abilities of Adolescents Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language: Evidence From Mediation Models. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596680
  29. Huff, C. L. (2017). A Study of Mandarin Homophony (Doctoral dissertation, Hertford College). Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:1b0bcc47-dd35-4108-9219-6616f82973ae
  30. Da, J. (2007). Chinese text computing corpus. http://lingua.mtsu.edu/chinese-computing/ copyright.html
  31. McWhorter, J. (2014). The Language Hoax. Oxford University Press.