Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.46> Article
Research Article

Effects of Student Choice on Intrinsic Motivation and Language Proficiency in High School L2 Education

Yiyi HouThe University of Sydney*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This literature review investigates the impact of student choice on intrinsic motivation and language proficiency in high school second language (L2) classrooms. The study addresses the existing gap in comprehensive research regarding how the implementation of student autonomy influences these educational outcomes. A systematic review of empirical studies, teaching practices, and peer-reviewed articles was conducted. Relevant keywords were used to search journals from different academic databases. The identified studies were evaluated based on their methodology, relevance, and quality. This review finds that providing students with autonomy in selecting learning materials and activities could enhance their intrinsic motivation. Increased autonomy fosters greater interest, engagement, and enjoyment in learning. However, the impact of autonomy on language proficiency is mixed. Some studies demonstrate improved proficiency due to personalised learning experiences, while others indicate that excessive autonomy without adequate instructional support can hinder language development. The review highlights the necessity of balancing autonomy with teacher guidance and considers the developmental stage of high school students. While student autonomy in high school L2 classrooms generally increases intrinsic motivation, its impact on language proficiency necessitates carefully combining autonomy with appropriate instructional support. This review underscores the need for longitudinal research to better understand the long-term effects of autonomy on motivation and proficiency, the development of sophisticated tools for measuring intrinsic motivation, and the implementation of practical strategies for integrating student choice in educational practices.

Keywords: student choice; intrinsic motivation; language proficiency; second language learning; learner autonomy
Published: September 10, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/46/20242276
Volume: CHR Vol.46
pp. 117-122
Download PDF

References

  1. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  2. Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational Orientations and Self‐Determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00111
  3. Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). A Person-in-Context Relational View of Emergent Motivation, Self and Identity. In Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (Vol. 36). Multilingual Matters.
  4. Johansen, M. O., Eliassen, S., & Jeno, L. M. (2023). "Why is this relevant for me?": increasing content relevance enhances student motivation and vitality. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1184804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184804
  5. Davis, W. S. (2018). What makes a learning experience intrinsically motivating for American high school language learners? Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2(3), 167–180.
  6. Proctor, C. P., Silverman, R. D., & Jones, R. L. (2021). Centering language and student voice in multilingual literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 75(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2051
  7. REEVE, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
  8. Marzuki, M., Indrawati, I., & H, I. Y. (2023). Teachers’ challenges in Promoting learner Autonomy. Pioneer, 15(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v15i1.2853
  9. Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and Researching: Autonomy in Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833767
  10. Bloemert, J., Paran, A., & Jansen, E. (2020). Connecting students and researchers: The secondary school student’s Voice in Foreign Language Education Research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(4), 429–449
  11. Pfeifer, J. H., & Berkman, E. T. (2018). The Development of Self and Identity in Adolescence: Neural Evidence and Implications for a Value-Based Choice Perspective on Motivated Behavior. Child development perspectives, 12(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12279
  12. LITTLE, D. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Perspectives on the Making of Supranational Language Education Policy. The Modern Language Journal (Boulder, Colo.), 91(4), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_2.x
  13. Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters Limited.
  14. Ushioda, E. (2009). 11. A Person-in-Context Relational View of Emergent Motivation, Self and Identity. In Multilingual Matters eBooks (pp. 215–228). https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-012
  15. Benson, P., & Reinders, H. (2011). Beyond the language classroom. Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Basri, F. (2020). Factors influencing learner autonomy and autonomy support in a faculty of education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1798921
  17. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and He Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative Research: Data Collection, Analysis, and Management. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 68(3), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1456
  19. Ma, Q. (2021). The Role of Teacher Autonomy Support on Students' Academic Engagement and Resilience. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 778581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778581
  20. Muth, J., & Lüftenegger, M. (2024). Associations between Autonomy-Supportive Teaching, the Use of Non-Academic ICTs, and Student Motivation in English Language Learning. Sustainability, 16(3), 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031337
  21. Ciani, K. D., Middleton, M. J., Summers, J. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.001
  22. Lazarides, R., Rohowski, S., Ohlemann, S., & Ittel, A. (2015). The role of classroom characteristics for students’ motivation and career exploration. Educational Psychology, 36(5), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1093608
  23. Jones, J. (2020). Innovations in learning: Design enhances engagement. Childhood Education, 96(1), 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2020.1707540