Research Article

A Case Study of the Correlation Between SAT Scores and Future Incomes

Suyang ChenBeijing Academy*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

With the acceleration of globalization, the role of education in economic and social development has become increasingly prominent. The SAT, as a measure of students' learning ability and potential achievement, has gained widespread attention and recognition around the world, and SAT scores, as an important indicator of students' academic performance, have a significant impact on students' future development and income levels. Previous research on the SAT has focused on factors that can influence SAT scores, such as family socioeconomic factors and high school academic performance, but there is a lack of research on whether SAT scores are effective in predicting an individual's future income level. In this paper, a correlation analysis was conducted using the questionnaire method and Pearson's coefficient, using data on the job position level and SAT scores of employees of Company A with a confidentiality agreement. The results show a significant positive correlation between SAT scores and future incomes. This finding emphasizes the importance of academic performance in high school to an individual's long-term economic prospects, enriches existing research, and provides new perspectives on return on investment analysis in higher education with theoretical implications. In addition, educational policymakers can thus focus more on improving students' SAT scores, which is of practical significance.

Keywords: SAT; Future income; Correlation analysis; Higher education
Published: August 31, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/39/20242218
Volume: CHR Vol.39
pp. 221-227
Download PDF

References

  1. Guinier, L. (2016). The tyranny of the meritocracy: Democratizing higher education in America. Beacon Press.
  2. Kohn, A. (1999). The schools our children deserve: moving beyond traditional classrooms and" tougher standards". Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  3. Sacks, P. (2000). Standardized minds: The high price of America's testing culture and what we can do to change it. National Association of Secondary School Principals. NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 118.
  4. AJ ALVERO*, SONIA GIEBEL, BEN GEBRE-MEDHIN, ANTHONY LISING ANTONIO, MITCHELL L. STEVENS, BENJAMIN W. DOMINGUE*.Essay content and style are strongly related to household income and SAT scores: Evidence from 60,000 undergraduate applications, 2021,10.1126/sciadv.abi9031:10-12
  5. Bankston III, C. L., Caldas, S. J., & Zhou, M. (1997). The academic achievement of Vietnamese American students: Ethnicity as social capital. Sociological Focus, 30(1), 1-16.
  6. Kohn, R., Smith, M., & Chan, D. (2001). Nonparametric regression using linear combinations of basis functions. Statistics and Computing, 11, 313-322.
  7. Koretz, D. (2008). A measured approach. American educator, 32(2), 18-39.
  8. Park, Y. S., Konge, L., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2020). The positivism paradigm of research. Academic medicine, 95(5), 690-694.
  9. Watson, R. (2015). Quantitative research. Nursing standard, 29(31).
  10. Holton, E. F., & Burnett, M. F. (2005). The basics of quantitative research. Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry, 29-44.