Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.40> Article
Research Article

Exploring the Identity of Chinese Cultural Relics on British Museum Websites Through Multimodal Discourse Analysis: A Case Study of the Official Website

Heting FengCommunication University of Zhejiang*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the re-construction of Chinese cultural identity in the British Museum's official website and analyze how its exhibition strategies influence the audience's perception and understanding of Chinese artifacts. By employing a multimodal discourse analysis method that combines textual and visual analysis, the study examines how the British Museum's official website presents the identity of Chinese artifacts from cultural, contextual, and formal perspectives. Additionally, utilizing the identity theory from a constructivist perspective, the study analyzes how identity is dynamically constructed, negotiated, and communicated through discourse. The research findings indicate that the identity of Chinese artifacts displayed on the British Museum's official website is relatively weak, suggesting room for more improvements. It is recommended to establish cooperative relationships with museums in the countries of origin of the artifacts to maintain the connection between artifacts and their original cultures, thereby promoting the inheritance of cultural heritage.

Keywords: Intercultural communication; Multimodal Discourse Analysis; Identity; Museums; Chinese Heritage
Published: August 27, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/40/20242219
Volume: CHR Vol.40
pp. 50-60
Download PDF

References

  1. Duthie E. The British Museum: an imperial museum in a post-imperial world[J]. Public History Review, 2011, 18: 12-25.
  2. Abungu, George Okello. 2022. Victims or victors: Universal museums and the debate on return and restitution, Africa’s perspective. In The Oxford Handbook of Museum Archaeology. Edited by Alice Stevenson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 271–88.
  3. Fincham, Derek. 2012. The Parthenon Sculptures and Cultural Justice. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 23: 1–74.
  4. Wan Y N. Graduation Resources in News Discourse: Calls for the British Museum to Return Chinese Cultural Artefacts[J]. Journalism and Media, 2024, 5(1): 189-202.
  5. Miles E. Holocaust Exhibitions On-Line: An Exploration of the Use and Potential of Virtual Space in British and American Museum Websites[J]. The Journal of Holocaust Education, 2001, 10(2): 79-99.
  6. Zhang Delu. Exploring a Comprehensive Theoretical Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Chinese Foreign Language, 2009 (1): 24-30.
  7. Alivizatou M. Museums and intangible heritage: The dynamics of an'unconventional'relationship[J]. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 2006, 17.
  8. Norris, S. 2004. Analysing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.
  9. Kress, G. & T. van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
  10. Halliday, M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1994, pp. F 39-57.
  11. Martin, J.R. English Text: System and Structure [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1992.
  12. O’Halloran K L. Multimodal discourse analysis[J]. The Bloomsbury handbook of discourse analysis, 2011: 249-282.
  13. Xin Zhiying. New Developments in Discourse Analysis - Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Journal of Social Sciences, 2018 (5): 208-211.
  14. Machin D. What is multimodal critical discourse studies?[J]. Critical discourse studies, 2013, 10(4): 347-355.
  15. Jones R H. Multimodal discourse analysis[J]. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 2012: 1-6.
  16. Lawler, S. (2008). Identity: Sociological Perspectives, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  17. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  18. Wendt A. Social theory of international politics[M]. Cambridge university press, 1999.
  19. Amineh R J, Asl H D. Review of constructivism and social constructivism[J]. Journal of social sciences, literature and languages, 2015, 1(1): 9-16.
  20. Kim B. Social constructivism[J]. Emerging perspectives on learning, tea
  21. Grossberg L, Hall S, Du Gay P. Questions of cultural identity[J]. Identity and Cultural Studies: Is that all there is, 1996: 87-107.
  22. Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalization London: Routledge.
  23. Chen Xinren. Identity Research from a Pragmatic Perspective - Key Issues and Main Paths. Modern Foreign Languages, 2014, 37(5): 702-710.
  24. Ainsworth S, Hardy C. Critical discourse analysis and identity: Why bother?[J]. Critical discourse studies, 2004, 1(2): 225-259.
  25. O'Toole, M. The Language of Displayed Art. London: Leicester University Press, 1994, pp. 8-20. Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Images. London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 1, 14, 17.
  26. Scollon , R. and S.W.Scollon. , Discourse in Place :Language in the Materia l World , London: Routledge, 2003 , pp.3-38.
  27. Djonov E, Zhao S. From multimodal to critical multimodal studies through popular discourse[M]//Critical multimodal studies of popular discourse. Routledge, 2013: 13-26.
  28. Way, L. Analysing Politics and Protest in Digital Popular Culture: A Multimodal Introduction. 2020.
  29. Vihersalo K. Agency in the Girl Effect campaign website: a multimodal discourse analytic study[D]. , 2012.
  30. Culache O, Obadă D R. Multimodality as a premise for inducing online flow on a brand website: a social semiotic approach[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 149: 261-268.
  31. Feng Dezhen, Zhang Delu, O'Halloran K. Advances and Frontiers in Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Contemporary Linguistics, 2014, 16(1): 88-99.
  32. Dai Shulan. The Origin and Progress of Multimodal Discourse Research. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2013 (2): 17-23.
  33. Liu Yu, Zhang Hongjun. Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Political Documentary Films Shaping National Image. Modern Communication: Journal of Communication University of China, 2018 (9): 118-122.
  34. Huang Dongqun. Study on the Construction of Fujian Image from the Perspective of Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Journal of Zhangzhou Vocational and Technical College, 2022, 24(3): 64-71.
  35. Zhang Delu, Wang Lu. Synergy of Modalities in Multimodal Discourse and Its Manifestation in Foreign Language Teaching. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2010 (2): 97-102.
  36. Zhu Yongsheng. Theoretical Foundation and Research Methods of Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2007 (5): 82-86.
  37. Chang Yiyuan. A Comparative Analysis of Multimodal Features in English and Chinese Websites - A Case Study of Museum Websites in China and the United States. Ningbo University, 2011.
  38. Zhao Ying, Zhang Xiaohui. Multimodal Representation of Social Participants in Economic Propaganda Discourse - A Case Study of Pudong and Binhai Development Zone Websites. Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2011, 28(06): 108-113.
  39. Pan Shuya, Zhang Yuqi. Virtual Presence: The Ritual Chain of Interaction in Online Fan Communities. International Journalism, 2014, 36(09): 35-46. DOI: 10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.2014.09.003.
  40. Triandafyllidou A. National identity and the 'other'[J]. Ethnic and racial studies, 1998, 21(4): 593-612.
  41. He Jinrui, Yan Jirong. On the Transition from Ethnic Identity to National Identity. Journal of Minzu University of China (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2008, (03): 5-12. DOI: 10.15970/j.cnki.1005-8575.2008.03.006.
  42. Slater D. Social relationships and identity online and offline[J]. Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs, 2002: 533-546.
  43. Falk J H. An identity‐centered approach to understanding museum learning[J]. Curator: The museum journal, 2006, 49(2): 151-166.
  44. Liu Meijun, Yu Xiao. Perception and Interaction: Enhancing the Interactive Experience in Museums. Furniture and Interior Decoration, 2022, 29(03): 61-65. DOI: 10.16771/j.cn43-1247/ts.2022.03.013.
  45. Laura Jane Smith, Zhang Yu. The Essence of Heritage is Essentially Intangible: Critical Studies on Heritage and Museum Research. Cultural Heritage, 2018, (03): 62-71.
  46. Miller C L, Hamell G R. A new perspective on Indian-White contact: Cultural symbols and colonial trade[J]. The Journal of American History, 1986, 73(2): 311-328.
  47. Pattee H H. Physical and functional conditions for symbols, codes, and languages[J]. Biosemiotics, 2008, 1: 147-168.
  48. Chkheidze, P., Tho, H. T., & Pasʹko, I. (Eds.). (2015). Symbols in Cultures and Identities in a Time of Global Interchange. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
  49. Lagerkvist C. The Museum of World Culture: A “glocal” museum of a new kind[J]. Scandinavian museums and cultural diversity, 2008: 89-100.
  50. Halliday M A K. Language and Education: Volume 9[M]. A&C Black, 2007.
  51. Earle W. Cultural education: Redefining the role of museums in the 21st century[J]. Sociology Compass, 2013, 7(7): 533-546.
  52. Waterworth J A. Multimedia interaction [M] // Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. North-Holland, 1997: 915-946.
  53. Van Dijk, translated by Zeng Qingxiang. News as Discourse. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 2003.
  54. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language[M]. Routledge, 2013.
  55. Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe, eds. Identities in talk. Sage, 1998.
  56. Weber C J. Ainsworth and Thomas Hardy[J]. The Review of English Studies, 1941, 17(66): 193-200.
  57. Shen Ning. Contemporary Paths to Community Building: An Analysis from the Perspectives of Museum Identity and Memory. The Editorial Department of Journal of Ethnology, 2021, 12(6): 68-76, 123.
  58. Shen Ning. The Journey of Museums from Temples to the Secular: The British National Museum Institute. China Museums, 2016 (4): 43-48.
  59. Sandahl J. The museum definition as the backbone of ICOM[J]. Museum International, 2019, 71(1-2): vi-9.