Research Article

Research on the Inclusion of "Being Subjected to a Cyber Attack" as a Condition for the Exercise of the Right

Ruofei DuEast China University of Political Science and Law*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

With the development of information technology, the scale of cyber-attacks is getting bigger and bigger, and the serious harm to national life is growing, while the relief of international law for the regulation of cyber-warfare is in a relatively blank state. Based on the traditional right, this paper will argue the possibility, necessity, jurisprudence, and practicability of including cyber attacks into the conditions of exercising the right from four perspectives (i.e., the advantages of countering cyber attacks by forces of self-defense, the exclusion of other remedies, the jurisprudential basis for the exercise of the right, as well as the study of the legislative attempts and legal achievements of the present-day in the field) in order to illustrate the rationality of the right and construct the elements and structure of the operation of this right on the basis of the law of armed conflict. The author also discusses the elements and structure of the operation of this right on the basis of the Law of Armed Conflict, in order to rationalize the proposal and make it more in line with international law’s spirit; and finally, discusses the disputes over the application of this system, provides new perspectives and suggestions for examining this issue.

Keywords: cyber attack; armed attack; right; Tallinn Manual; international law
Published: July 31, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/37/20240122
Volume: CHR Vol.37
pp. 141-153
Download PDF

References

  1. Charter of the United Nations, Articles 2.
  2. ICJ. (1986). Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua. Judgment. ICJ Reports. (Note: Seethe Nicaragua Case, Para. 194.)
  3. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (article 6)
  4. Simma, B., & Paulus, A. (2012). The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  5. Franck, T. M. (2002). Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  6. Smith, J. (2018). Cyber attacks and the use of force: Back to the future of Article 2(4). Yale Journal of International Law, 43(1): 19-46
  7. Johnson, M. (2017). Global governance of cyberspace: The search for a new equilibrium. Global Policy, 8(S4): 40-45.
  8. Shackelford, and Scott J., Managing Cyber Attacks in International Law, Business(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014), pp. 285-306.
  9. Schmitt, M. (2010).Proceedings of a Workshop on Deterring Cyberattacks: Informing Strategies and Developing Options for U.S. Policy. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  10. Twenty Years in Retrospect: International Humanitarian Law and the Protection of Civilians from Cyber Operations in Armed Conflict Laurent Giselle, Tilman Rodenhauser, Knut Dorman IRRC No. 913 March https://international-review.icrc.org/zh-hans/articles/twenty-years-ihl-effects-of-cyber-operations-during-armed-conflicts-913
  11. "Finding the Largest Common Denominator for International Governance of Cyberspace - Interview with Wu Shenguo, UN Senior Advisor on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime" December 2019 UN News https://news.un.org/zh/story/2019/12/1047311
  12. Statute of the ICJ, article 38
  13. Maritime Operations Act Manual of the United States Navy
  14. Libicki,C.(2009). Cyber Deterrence and Cyberwar, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica
  15. Additional Protocol I, article 51, para. 5 (b); article 57