Research Article

Environmental Protection under Free Trade --Analysis of China's Rare Earth Resources Export Restriction Case

Zhiyu ZhangThe university of Sydney*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

With the rapid development of today's society and economy, the exploitation and utilization of natural resources and the environment are also intensifying in various countries, and China is no exception. In order to realize the socialist modernization power, China's economic development can not be delayed, for the use of rare earth resources and the protection of attention is also essential, in this context, in 2012, the United States, the European Union, Japan v.China to WTO dispute settlement mechanism, on China's rare earth resources and other raw materials export restrictions on the lawsuit, so that a "war of defense of rare earths Since then, a "rare earth defense war" has been launched, in the case of The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT1994) Article 20 of the general exceptions to environmental protection regulations can be invoked to apply, became the main focus of controversy in the case. Meanwhile, under the conditions of WTO trade freedom rules, how China coordinates its domestic policies and improves the environmental protection measures for natural resources is also an issue worth thinking about.

Keywords: Rare Earth; GATT1994 Article20; Freedom of Trade; Natural Resource Conservation
Published: July 31, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/41/2024NE0028
Volume: CHR Vol.41
pp. 55-59
Download PDF

References

  1. Ma, L. (2013). Adjustment Strategies for China's Rare Earth Export Quota and Tariff System - Taking the Current Rare Earth Case as a Background. Science and Management, 33(6), 77.
  2. World Trade Organization. (2014). China -- Measures related to the exportation of various raw materials. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds394_e.htm
  3. World Trade Organization. (2014). China - Measures related to the exportation of rare earths, tungsten, and molybdenum. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds431_e.htm
  4. Morgenthau, H. J. (2014). A realist theory of international politics. in The realism reader (pp. 53-59). Routledge.
  5. Jiang, Z. (2016). The Application of Article 20 of GATT 1994 to China's Export Restrictive Measures. China Youth Politics Institute, 7.
  6. Zhang, L., Jiang, B., et al. (2020). Toxicity of rare earth elements: An overview on human health impact. Frontiers in Chemistry, 8, 570.
  7. World Trade Organization. (2012). China -- Measures related to the exportation of various raw materials (DS394/DS395). Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds394_e.htm
  8. World Trade Organization. (2014). Dispute Settlement Body, Summary of the meeting on August 29, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news14_e/dsb_29aug14_e.htm
  9. Li, X. (2013). On the Application of Article 20 of the GATT: The Case of China's Raw Material Export Restrictive Measures as a Perspective. Dalian Maritime University, 15.
  10. China Rare Earths Online. (n.d.). Rare Earths WTO Litigation Defeat and Implications. Retrieved from http://www.cre-ol.com/_d276352934.htm