Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.38> Article
Research Article

Understanding the Fate Views of Ming Dynasty Literati Through “A Fortunate Man and Dongtinghong”

Yeye OuThe Hang Seng University of Hong Kong*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

In the Ming Dynasty, two distinct views on fate emerged among literati: “predestination theory” and “changing fate theory.” The former adhered to the acceptance of predestined fate, denying subjective agency, believing that fate cannot be altered by individual efforts. The formation of this perspective was closely related to the disillusionment of literati in their careers and the harsh reality brought about by the intense competition in the prosperous commodity economy of the Ming Dynasty. Analyzing this phenomenon is conducive to understanding the contradictions between Ming Dynasty monarchy and the development of the commodity economy, as well as the external manifestations of self-contradictory thoughts and influencing factors. Utilizing the method of literature review, this study primarily interprets the chapter “A Fortunate Man and Dongtinghong” from “Amazing Tales-First Series,” presenting new concepts and finding relevant supporting materials based on previous research.

Keywords: Ming Dynasty literati; views on fate; San Yan Er Pai
Published: June 26, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/38/20240165
Volume: CHR Vol.38
pp. 31-36
Download PDF

References

  1. Qin, L. (2003). A commercial interpretation of “A Fortunate Man and Dongtinghong.” Journal of Nanchang University (Social Sciences Edition), 6, 112-116.
  2. Guo, X. (2013). A discussion on the Confucian merchant image in “Er Pai.” Journal of Changchun Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 4, 82-91.
  3. Cheng, S. (2006). Lun Yu Ji Shi: Yan Yuan Chapter. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
  4. Zhang, Y. (2011). A brief discussion on the traditional Confucian concept of fate. Academic Exchange, 3, 29-32.
  5. Schwartz, B. (2004). The Thought World of Ancient China (G. Cheng, Trans., D. Liu, Ed.). Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House.
  6. Han, J. (2015). “Predestination” and “changing fate”: Ming dynasty literati’s view of fate. Heilongjiang Annals, 2, 270-271.
  7. Feng, B. (2001). Ling Mengchu’s novel creation and late Ming philosophical trends. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 3, 141-146.
  8. Meng, S. (2009). Lectures on the History of the Ming Dynasty. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
  9. Chen, G. (2011). The Central Civil Officials System and Literature in the Ming Dynasty: Preface (in Ye, Y., The Central Civil Officials System and Literature in the Ming Dynasty, pp. XX). Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.
  10. Ling, M. (2014). Chronicles of the Sui and Tang Dynasties, Volume 1. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
  11. Xiang, Y. (2006). An analysis of the influence of Wang Yangming’s Neo-Confucianism on Ming dynasty historiography - also considering thoughts on expanding historiographical studies. Journal of Huaibei Coal Teachers College (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 1, 7-9.
  12. Yuan, H. (1981). Collected Notes of Yuan Hongdao, Volume 41. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.