A Brief History of Ends/Goals: How Can Goals (Motivation) Emerge from a Goalless World?
Abstract
This paper will be devoted to the discussion of the concept of goal in human understanding. The scientific discussion of it can be traced back to ancient Greece, where it was called teleology. This triggered a lot of questions: as theories prostrating the universe as uniformed emerged, these types of teleological ideas were attracted by natural philosophers studying determinism: things do not exist to serve a purpose, they exist only because, under the influence of other things in the world, they have to be there. The sun is not there to provide brightness to the world, it was there long before the exitance of the world. Nevertheless, the unsettling problem is that human beings do, a lot of times, think in a goal-directed way, so how to reconcile the fact that no teleological language can explain natural phenomena with the fact that teleological thinking exists in human understanding becomes the million dollar question. Still, there could be a solution, not as straightforward as the problem, but sufficient to demonstrate how goals can emerge from a goalless nature. With the conatus theory as the basis, this paper is going to review how it can be the building block of the nowadays negative feedback loop model and such a model is also a variation of Hume theory of association and passion.
References
- Aristotle, Madigan, A., & Aristotle. (2016). 1050a9–17. In Metaphysics. essay, Interactive Media.
- Parmenides, Coxon, A. H., & McKirahan, R. D. (2009). The fragments of Parmenides a critical text with introduction and translation, the ancient Testimonia and a commentary. Parmenides Pub.
- Descartes René, Haldane, E., & Descartes René. (2016). Meditation III. In Discourse on method and meditations on First philosophy. essay, Digireads.com Publishing.
- Spinoza, B. de, Shirley, S., & Feldman, S. (1992). part 3, prop. 6. In The ethics ; treatise on the emendation of the intellect ; selected letters. essay, Hackett Pub. Co.
- Dougherty, P. (n.d.). Central Control of the autonomic nervous system and thermoregulation. Central Control of the Autonomic Nervous System and Thermoregulation (Section 4, Chapter 3) Neuroscience Online: An Electronic Textbook for the Neurosciences | Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy - The University of Texas Medical School at Houston. Retrieved June 12, 2022, from https://nba.uth.tmc.edu/neuroscience/m/s4/chapter03.html#:~:text=Regulation%20of%20body%20temperature%20is,control%20the%20dissipation%20of%20heat.
- Powers, W. T. (1973). Feedback: Beyond Behaviorism. Science, 179(4071), 351–356. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1735375
- Berridge, K. C. (1996). Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 20(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(95)00033-b
- Berridge, K. C., Robinson, T. E., & Aldridge, J. W. (2009). Dissecting components of reward: ‘liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 9(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014
- Kringelbach ML. (2010). The hedonic brain: A functional neuroanatomy of human pleasure. In: Kringelbach ML, Berridge KC, editors. Pleasures of the brain. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. pp. 202–221.
- Kringelbach ML, O'Doherty J, Rolls ET, Andrews C. (2003). Activation of the human orbitofrontal cortex to a liquid food stimulus is correlated with its subjective pleasantness. Cerebral Cortex, 13(10), 1064–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.10.1064
- Small DM, Zatorre RJ, Dagher A, Evans AC, Jones-Gotman M. (2001). Changes in brain activity related to eating chocolate: From pleasure to aversion. Brain, 124(9), 1720–1733. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.9.1720
- Hume, D. (2021). Enquiry concerning human understanding. OTBEBOOKPUBLISHING.
- Hume, D. (2007). Book II. In A treatise of human nature. essay, Wildside Books.
- Brown, T. (1806). Observations on the nature and tendency of the doctrine of mr. Hume, concerning the relation of cause and effect. Printed for Mundell and Son.