Using Corpus Linguistics as a Tool in Legal Interpretation
Abstract
Over the past decade, the application of corpus linguistics in legal interpretation has received attention from a group of scholars that engage in legal academics and linguistics. When the law takes into account the distribution of language usage, the application of corpus linguistics can help with addressing legal challenges. Before concluding that corpus analysis is optimally persuasive, the study addresses four difficulties that need to be addressed: The distribution of language use among a certain community must be the primary focus of the legal problem; Second, what constitutes a "ordinary" reading should be determined by the court; Thirdly, while searching a corpus to determine a term's usual meaning, one must predetermine what to look for; Fourth, there are a variety of reasons that a given meaning may turn up weak in a corpus search, and they should be recognized. Through analysis, this paper finds that though drawing on academic research and the experience of foreign judicial practice, Chinese scholars can enrich the research methods of the interdisciplinary field of law and linguistics, and provide inspiration for the nascent movement and the development of judicial practice.
References
- Hunston, Susan. 2011. Corpus approaches to evaluation. Phraseology and evaluative language. New York/London: Routledge
- Zanettin, Federico. 2012. Translation-driven corpora. Corpus resources for descriptive and applied translation studies. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
- Nix v. Hedden. 1893. 149 U.S. 304
- Slocum, Brian. 2015. Ordinary Meaning: A Theory of the most Fundamental Principle of Legal Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Smith v. United States. 508 US 2231993.
- Solan, Lawrence M., and Tammy Gales. 2017. Corpus linguistics as a tool in legal interpretation. BYU Law Review 2017: 1311–1357.
- Frankfurter, Felix. 1947. Some reflections on the reading of statute. Columbia Law Review 47: 527–546, United States v. Costello, 666 F.3d 1040 (7th Cir. 2012)
- United States v. Costello, 666 F.3d 1040 (7th Cir. 2012)
- United States v. Costello, 666 F.3d 1044–45 (7th Cir. 2012)