Research Article

Modern Chinese Scholars' Perspectives on Zhuangzi's Aesthetics

Weicheng QuQingdao No.9 High School, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Modern Chinese scholars of Zhuangzi's aesthetics can be illustrated by the words of Liu Shaojin in Zhuangzi and Chinese Aesthetics. The aesthetic significance of the book Zhuangzi is not a theoretical summary of beauty and art as objects, but rather, when it comes to its 'Dao', it's understanding of The aesthetic significance of Zhuangzi's book is not a theoretical summary of beauty and art, but a coincidence between its experience and realm of 'Tao' and the aesthetic experience and realm of art. Because of this coincidence, later generations naturally transposed these philosophical questions with aesthetic overtones to the understanding of the aesthetic characteristics of art, thus giving new meaning to Zhuangzi's philosophical propositions. In this sense, people believe that the literary and artistic thoughts and aesthetic theories contained in Zhuangzi are not distinguished by the correctness of their conclusions, but by the illuminating, suggestive, and profound way in which they touch upon the issues in the course of their exposition. This suggests that Chinese scholars have a dialectical approach to Zhuangzi's philosophical aesthetics, and that needs a careful look at examples like Zhili Shu with a critical eye in modern times.

Keywords: Zhili Shu; Zhuangzi; aesthetics
Published: May 17, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/4/20220741
Volume: CHR Vol.4
pp. 491-496
Download PDF

References

  1. Liu, X. (2020) Classifying the Zhuangzi chapters (p. 241). University of Michigan Press.
  2. Zhuangzi (2003)Basic Writings. Columbia University Press
  3. Ivanhoe, P. J. (1993) Zhuangzi on skepticism, skill, and the ineffable Dao. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 61(4), 639-654.
  4. Klein, E. (2010) Were there “Inner Chapters” in the Warring States? A new examination of evidence about the Zhuangzi. T'oung Pao, 96(4), 299-369.
  5. Moeller, H. G., & D'Ambrosio, P. J. (2017) Genuine pretending: On the philosophy of the Zhuangzi. Columbia University Press.
  6. Galvany, A. (2019) Radical alterity in the Zhuangzi: On the political and philosophical function of monsters. Philosophy Compass, 14(9), e12617.
  7. Li, C. (2002) Fang Dongmei: Philosophy of Life, Creativity, and Inclusiveness. CHUNG-YING CHENG AND, 263.
  8. Sernelj, T. (2014) The Unity of Body and Mind in Xu Fuguan’s Theory. Asian Studies, 2(1), 83-95.
  9. Huang, C. C. (2019) Xu Fuguan in the Context of East Asian Confucianisms. University of Hawaii Press.
  10. Sernelj, T. (2020) Different Approaches to Chinese Aesthetics: Fang Dongmei and Xu Fuguan. Asian Studies, 8(3), 161-182.
  11. Sernelj, T. (2013) Xu Fuguan’s Concept of Anxiety and Its Connection to Religious Studies. Asian Studies, 1(2), 71-87.