Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.33> Article
Research Article

Rationality and Justice: Textual investigation Based on A Theory of Justice

Yuqian YangNankai University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Rawls put forward the concepts of "the original state" and "the Veil of ignorance" in his book A Theory of Justice, which made an outstanding contribution to the reconstruction of the social contract theory. On this basis, he demonstrated the combination of the two principles of justice, namely the principle of equal liberty, the principle of equal opportunity and difference principle, which had a strong impact on the long-term mainstream utilitarian view of justice. Based on the textual investigation of A Theory of Justice, this paper starts from the reason basis shared by the two, takes the relationship between reason and justice as a clue, analyzes the differences between Rawls and utilitarianism in moral philosophy and methodology, and explains the connotation of Rawls's two principles of justice in detail. On the other hand, Rawls' systematic recognition and adoption of utilitarianism, as well as the utilitarian characteristics presented in the principle of difference, make the relationship between the two show a complex state of opposition and interwoven. In this paper, Rawls's theory of justice will be deeply explored, and the internal logic of Rawls's thought of justice will be analyzed, so as to further clarify the relationship between reason and justice.

Keywords: Rawls; justice; utilitarianism
Published: May 24, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/33/20240114
Volume: CHR Vol.33
pp. 270-275
Download PDF

References

  1. HU Dan-dan &HUST, Rawls and Sen: Positive Correlation between Two Heterogeneous Justice Theories[J]Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition),2023,37(06):132-137.DOI:10.19648/j.cnki.jhustss1980.2023.06.15.
  2. John Rawls，The Law of Peoples，Harvard University Press，2001.
  3. ZHANG Weitao,The Limitations of Utilitarian Rights Theory: A Study Centered on Rawls' Criticism[J].Qinghai Social Sciences,2018,(04):89-96.DOI:10.14154/j.cnki.qss.2018.04.014.
  4. John Rawls，A Theory of Justice，Harvard University Press，2005
  5. LI Wei,JIANG Young,Interpretation of Justice: The Emergence of Moral Norms: From the Perspective of Western Social Contract Theory[J]Social Sciences in Guangdong,2023,(02):72-81.
  6. YANG Weiqing.Rethinking the ignorance of Rawls[J] Studies in Ethics,2023,(05):81-89.DOI:10.15995/j.cnki.llxyj.2023.05.006.
  7. Kymlicka W.Contemporary political philosophy:an introduction (2nd)[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2002．
  8. XIE Changqing, ZHANG Jinjie,On the Priority of Rawls' Liberty[J]Academic Monthly,2024,56(01):92-101.DOI:10.19862/j.cnki.xsyk.000780.
  9. Wang Li,Rawls' Triple Criticism towards Utilitarianism[J].Social Science Journal,2024,(01):5-13+237+2.
  10. Yao Dazhi.The Principle of Difference and Democratic Equality[J].Social Science Journal,2010,(04):4-9.
  11. LIU Riming WANG Meile,Why is the"Fusion"of Marx and Rawls Impossible:A Reflection on Brudney's Interpretation of Marx's Political Philosophy as a Clue[J].Journal of Social Sciences,2024(01):31-40+68.DOI:10.13644/j.cnki.cn31-1112.2024.01.014.
  12. GONG Qun,Priority of Justice: Analysis on John Ｒawls’Social Institutional Justice[J]Journal of Hubei University ( Philosophy and Social Science),2021,48(06):1-8+178.DOI:10.13793/j.cnki.42-1020/c.2021.06.001.
  13. The Cambridge Companion to RAWLS,Edited by Samuel Freeman ,University of Pennsylvania ,Cambridge University Press, 2003.