The Gender Show in “Midjourney”: The Stubborn Biases and Gender Fantasies of AI Painting Tools
Abstract
Currently, AI drawing has made significant progress, with various AI drawing software and tools emerging. However, the binary gender concepts present in AI drawing have sparked discussions and controversies among users. These gender concepts manifest as inherent stereotypes and societal biases in the gender expression and portrayal within AI-generated images. The "Midjourney" AI painting tool is utilized in this study to generate prompts encompassing gender narratives, produce corresponding AI images, conduct data statistics on these images, and perform visual symbol analysis on the image content, so as to investigate the degree of gender fluidity. The results reveal that "Midjourney" exhibits distinct gender biases in gender roles, gender features, appearance, clothing, and color presentation. This suggests a low level of gender fluidity in AI drawing tools, indicating significant gender biases and stereotypes, along with visual cultural features dominated by male influences.
References
- Butler, Judith. (2009). Gender Trouble:Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore.
- Long, D. (2008). Image narration and text narration: Image and text in story painting. Social Sciences of Jiangxi (3), 16, p. 28-43.
- Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., & Ommer, B. (2022). Text-Guided Synthesis of Artistic Images with Retrieval-Augmented Diffusion Models.
- Brade, S., Wang, B., Sousa, M., Oore, S., & Grossman, T. (2023). Promptify: Text-to-Image Generation through Interactive Prompt Exploration with Large Language Models.
- Dehouche, N., & Dehouche, K. (2023). What is in a Text-to-Image Prompt: The Potential of Stable Diffusion in Visual Arts Education.
- Xie, Y., Pan, Z., Ma, J., Luo, J., & Mei, Q. (2023). A Prompt Log Analysis of Text-to-Image Generation Systems.
- Oppenlaender, J. (2022). A Taxonomy of Prompt Modifiers for Text-To-Image Generation,1-14.
- Stoller, RobertJ. (1994). Sex and Gender: The Development of Masculinity and Femininity.
- Rubin, G. (2007). Thinking sex: notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Culture, Society and Sexuality (pp. 166–203). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966105-21
- Thomas, R. M. (2001). Recent theories of human development. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233673
- Ji Caixue.(2022). The Construction of Masculinity and Femininity in the "Nigeria Trilogy" Master's thesis, Hebei University of Science and Technology.
- Vetterling-Braggin, M. (1982). “Femininity,” “masculinity,” and “androgyny” : a modern philosophical discussion. Rowman and Littlefield eBooks,Rowman and Littlefield eBooks.
- Bosson, J. K., & Vandello, J. A. (2011). Precarious Manhood and Its Links to Action and Aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402669
- Thomas, R. M. (2001). Recent theories of human development, p.248.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233673
- Kalat, J. W. (2016). Introduction to Psychology. Cengage Learning, 184.
- Mulvey, L. (1975b). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
- Blinder, D., & Gombrich, E. H. (1983). The Image and the Eye: Further studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 42(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.2307/429951.
- Flügel, J. C. (1930). The psychology of clothes, 135, https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA66083997
- Ueno, T. & Wang, L. (2015). Misogyny: The Disgust of Women in Japan. Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore, p.20.