Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.31> Article
Research Article

A Study on Bias Against Women in Advertisements

Yanqiu HongShanghai Adcote School Jun WeiXiaozhan Education Qiuyu WuCity University of Macao* Zhining ZhangNanjing Foreign Language School Jiaoyang XuNorth American International School

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

In the era of digitalization and globalization, advertising wields an even greater impact on modern society than ever before. While feminism has challenged the male-dominated society for decades, one can still observe the persistence of gender stereotypes, especially sexist discrimination, influencing the representation of women in the media. This paper aims to critically examine several advertisements for daily necessities, analyzing their content and impact to investigate specific patterns of discrimination against women in the modern advertising industry. In terms of structure, this paper will address the following issues: First, it will provide a brief review of recent research on motherhood and the male gaze. Then, it will analyze specific examples of advertisements, discussing the contested female images they portray. In particular, this research will focus on pressures related to gender roles, sex discrimination, and the male gaze as three typical issues. Finally, we will offer suggestions for the advertising industry and content creators. The goal of this paper is to present a clear picture of the persistent gender issues within advertising today and propose ways to address them in the future. By analyzing the framework of advertisements and their cultural implications, this research will shed light on a more comprehensive examination of the misrepresentation of women in the media.

Keywords: Bias; Chinese advertisement; Motherhood; Male gaze
Published: May 17, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/31/20232067
Volume: CHR Vol.31
pp. 174-179
Download PDF

References

  1. T. Davis, “Representations of mothers in ads haven’t changed in 60 years,” The University of Sydney, https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2019/12/18/representations-of-mothers-in-ads-haven-t-changed-in-60-years.html (accessed Sep. 24, 2023).
  2. T. Davis, M. K. Hogg, D. Marshall, A. Petersen, and T. Schneider, “The knowing mother: Maternal knowledge and the reinforcement of the feminine consuming subject in magazine advertisements,” Journal of Consumer Culture, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 40–60, 2019. doi:10.1177/1469540519889990.
  3. B. L. Fredrickson and T.-A. Roberts, “Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 173–206, 1997. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
  4. J. Nasco, “Pressure of motherhood: Print advertisements,” Consuming Women Liberating Women Women and Advertising in the Mid 20th Century, https://sites.duke.edu/womenandadvertising/exhibits/reproductive-v-pressure-motherhood/pressure-print-ads/ (accessed Sep. 24, 2023).
  5. X. Wu, “The Paradox of Motherhood: From Feminist Criticism to Chinese Motherhood Strategies,” journal of China Women’s University., no. 2, pp. 30–40, 2021.
  6. S. Vanbuskirk, “What is the male gaze?,” Verywell Mind, https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-male-gaze-5118422 (accessed Sep. 24, 2023).
  7. C. S. Stamarski and L. S. Son Hing, “Gender inequalities in the workplace: The effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, 2015. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400
  8. L. L. Carli, L. Alawa, Y. Lee, B. Zhao, and E. Kim, “Stereotypes about gender and science,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 244–260, 2016. doi:10.1177/0361684315622645
  9. R. W. Connell and J. W. Messerschmidt, “Faut-il repenser le concept de masculinité hégémonique ?,” Terrains & travaux, vol. N° 27, no. 2, pp. 151–192, 2015. doi:10.3917/tt.027.0151