Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.31> Article
Research Article

How Compliments and Compliment Responses Differ for American and Chinese People on Instagram

Jiaying YangUniversity of California Irvine*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper reports a qualitative study on complimenting behaviors and response strategies of American English speakers (AES) and Chinese speakers (CS). It explores how the two speech groups differ in their patterns of compliment and response behaviors on Instagram. There are 26 participants who have answered a questionnaire that asks them to rate certain statements and let them give examples of compliments and responses. This paper will discuss the interpretations of the questionnaire and link them to linguistic politeness in virtual contexts and second language learning. Some limitations regarding each step of the research are that the sample size is too small to generalize the result to a greater population and that some questions in the questionnaire were not carefully designed. Future research should take note of the limitations and avoid them as much as possible.

Keywords: social media comment; compliment; compliment response; cross-cultural pragmatics
Published: May 17, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/31/20232061
Volume: CHR Vol.31
pp. 160-165
Download PDF

References

  1. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. (2021). Pragmatics and speech acts. The Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA): Pragmatics and Speech Acts. https://carla.umn.edu/speechacts/index.html. Retrieved on August 9, 2023.
  2. Holmes, J. (1988). Paying Compliments: A Sex-Preferential Politeness Strategy. Journal of Pragmatics 12, 445-465.
  3. Manes, J. & Wolfson, N. (1981). The compliment formula. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech (pp. 116-132). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.
  4. Manes, J. (1983). Compliments: A mirror of cultural values. In N. Wolfson and E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition (pp. 82-95). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  5. Herbert, R. K. (1990). Sex-based differences in compliment behavior. Language in Society, 19, 201-224.
  6. Placencia, M. E. & Lower, A. (2017) Compliments and compliment responses. Pragmatics of Social Media. Handbooks of Pragmatics (HOPS) 11. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter, pp. 633-660. ISBN 9783110431070.
  7. Pratama, H. (2019) Linguistic Politeness in Online Communication. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
  8. Chen, R. (1993). Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 20, 49-75.
  9. Brown, P & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge Univ. Pr.
  10. Nelson, G. L., Al-batal, M. & Echols, E. (1996). Arabic and English compliment responses: Potential for pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 411-432.
  11. Herbert, R. K. (1989). The ethnography of English compliments and compliment responses: A contrastive sketch. In W. Olesky (Ed.), Contrastive pragmatics (pp. 3-35). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  12. Sun, N. (2014). Gender-based Differences in Complimenting Behaviour: A Critical Literature Review. The ANU Undergraduate Research Journal, 5: 213-222.
  13. Onursoy, S. (2018). Using emojis: Self-presentation and different meaning creation approaches. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İleti-ş-Im Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.500954
  14. Herbert, R. K. & Straight, S. (1989). Compliment Rejection versus Compliment-Avoidance: Listener-based Versus Speaker-based Pragmatic Strategies. Language and Communication, 9 (1), 35-47.