Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.31> Article
Research Article

Female Non-Resistance to Sexual Harassment -- An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective

Qiantong LiuUniversity of Washington Yunnong PengHigh School Affiliated to South China Normal University Ziyuan ShuRanney School Yuqi XieNew York University* Ruobin ZhaoMalvern college

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Sexual harassment is a pervasive problem that affects individuals in a variety of social contexts, especially in the workplace and public spaces. Researcher has examined the complex phenomenon of women's non-resistance to sexual harassment and explore in depth the psychological, sociocultural and reproductive factors that lead women to not actively oppose or confront sexual harassment. Drawing on both evolutionary and survival perspectives, the paper explores the complex interplay between reproductive strategies, survival motivations, and social norms. Through the survey-based approach, we qualify the relationship between the women's varying responses to sexual harassment and harasser's social-economic status and physical appearance, taking into account scenarios in the workplace, campus, and public spaces. The results showed that women's resistance to sexual harassment changed with the various degrees of social status and appearance of the harasser. The implications of this research extend to understanding gender dynamics, workplace policies, and the social impact of sexual harassment. The study also acknowledges the limitations of sample representation and cultural context, providing avenues for future research on this important and sensitive topic. By revealing the multifaceted nature of non-resistance, it helps to understand women’s experiences and decisions more fully in the face of sexual harassment.

Keywords: Evolutionary Psychology; Sexual Harassment; Non-Resistant behavior
Published: May 17, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/31/20231922
Volume: CHR Vol.31
pp. 85-91
Download PDF

References

  1. K. T. Schneider, S. Swan, and L. F. Fitzgerald, “Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations.,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 401–415, 1997, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.401.
  2. M. Rajkumar, “The History Behind Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Law,” Nyaaya. Accessed: Nov. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://nyaaya.org/guest-blog/the-history-behind-sexual-harassment-at-the-workplace-law/
  3. “Victims of Sexual Violence: Statistics | RAINN.” Accessed: Nov. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.rainn.org/statistics/victims-sexual-violence
  4. C. C. Miller, “It’s Not Just Fox: Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Harassment,” The New York Times, Apr. 10, 2017. Accessed: Nov. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/10/upshot/its-not-just-fox-why-women-dont-report-sexual-harassment.html
  5. R. P. Rajkumar, “Cultural collectivism, intimate partner violence, and women’s mental health: An analysis of data from 151 countries,” Front. Sociol., vol. 8, p. 1125771, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1125771.
  6. B. Huebl, “Japan’s attitude to sexual harassment toughens,” Nikkei Asia. Accessed: Nov. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Datawatch/Japan-s-attitude-to-sexual-harassment-toughens
  7. L. F. Fitzgerald, S. Swan, and V. J. Magley, “But was it really sexual harassment?: Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women,” in Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment, Needham Heights, MA, US: Allyn & Bacon, 1997, pp. 5–28.
  8. K. R. Browne, “Sex, power, and dominance: the evolutionary psychology of sexual harassment,” Manage Decis Econ, vol. 27, no. 2–3, pp. 145–158, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1002/mde.1289.
  9. D. M. Buss, “The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating,” Choice Reviews Online, vol. 32, no. 02, pp. 32-1010-32–1010, Oct. 1994, doi: 10.5860/CHOICE.32-1010.
  10. S. W. Gangestad, C. E. Garver-Apgar, J. A. Simpson, and A. J. Cousins, “Changes in women’s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle.,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 151–163, 2007, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.151.
  11. D. M. Buss, “Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures,” Behav Brain Sci, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Mar. 1989, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00023992.
  12. C. G. Hart, “Trajectory Guarding: Managing Unwanted, Ambiguously Sexual Interactions at Work,” Am Sociol Rev, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 256–278, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0003122421993809.
  13. A. Todorov, “Evaluating Faces on Trustworthiness: An Extension of Systems for Recognition of Emotions Signaling Approach/Avoidance Behaviors,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1124, no. 1, pp. 208–224, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.012.
  14. B. S. Fisher, F. T. Cullen, and M. G. Turner, “The Sexual Victimization of College Women. Research Report,” Washington DC: National Institute of Justice., Dec. 2000. Accessed: Nov. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED449712
  15. C. Laverty, “What is Sexual about Sexual Violence?,” Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 383–404, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqad019.
  16. H. M. Clarke, “#Metoo or #Hertoo? A Moderated Mediation Model of Gender Differences in Perceptions of Sexual Harassment,” Arch Sex Behav, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 3105–3120, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02344-1.