Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.30> Article
Research Article

Approaches to Metaphor: Cognitive-linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives

Ziying JinNanjing Foreign Language School*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Metaphor has been a significant topic of discussion in several academic fields besides being extensively used in daily life. This article explores the interdisciplinary study of metaphor, a complex and connotative concept that has been the primary concern across various disciplines, including linguistics, philosophy, literature, and other humanities. The article presents multiperspective theories and metaphor analysis from the said disciplines to provide a more holistic understanding of metaphor. This includes analyzing metaphors in analytic philosophy and cognitive science, primarily focusing on the conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, complemented by analysis of the relevance theory, the blending theory, etc. While there are criticisms of CMT, it remains an influential theory in studying metaphor. The article also discusses the relevance theory, which suggests that using metaphors in speech can help achieve optimal relevancy, and the blending theory, which proposes that metaphors involve mapping elements from one mental space onto another to create a blended mental space that combines elements of both. This paper also addresses continental philosophers' usage or account of metaphor, from Kant to Derrida, in establishing their arguments. The essay then discusses and integrates ideas in metaphor studies from the perspectives of semantics and pragmatics. Finally, the article emphasizes the importance of bridging the gap between abstract conceptualizations and concrete linguistic expressions to gain a holistic understanding of metaphor.

Keywords: Metaphor; Metaphor Studies; Philosophy of language
Published: May 17, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/30/20231666
Volume: CHR Vol.30
pp. 133-139
Download PDF

References

  1. Gibbs, R. W. (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103
  3. Mácha, J. (2019). Metaphor in Analytic Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 75(4), 2247–2286. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26869269
  4. Kimmel, M. (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of pragmatics, 42(1), 97-115.
  5. Costello, D. J. (1995). Explaining metaphor: A pluralistic approach. [University of Massachusetts Amherst]. https://doi.org/10.7275/ZW38-5H55
  6. Ritchie, L. D. (2004). Lost in “Conceptual Space”: Metaphors of Conceptual Integration. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1901_2
  7. Fludernik, M. (2011). Beyond cognitive metaphor theory: Perspectives on literary metaphor. Routledge.
  8. Tendahl, M., & Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 1823–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.001
  9. Johnson, M. (Ed.). (1981). Philosophical perspectives on metaphor. Univ. of Minnesota Press.
  10. Eagleton, T. (2011). Literary Theory. John Wiley & Sons.
  11. Cazeaux, Clive. (2009). Metaphor and Continental Philosophy From Kant to Derrida. Routledge.
  12. Kearney, R. (1995). Modern Movements in European Philosophy. Manchester University Press.
  13. Fludernik, M., Freeman, D. C., & Freeman, M. H. (1999). Metaphor and Beyond: An Introduction. Poetics Today, 20(3), 383–396. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1773271
  14. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–5 8). New York: Academic Press.
  15. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
  16. van der Henst, J. B., Carles, L., & Sperber, D. (2002, November). Truthfulness and Relevance in Telling The Time. Mind and Language, 17(5), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00207
  17. Hale, B., Wright, C., & Miller, A. (Eds.). (2017). A Companion to the Philosophy of Language (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118972090
  18. Krupa, V. (1991). Eva Feder Kittay: Metaphor. Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Human Affairs, 1(2), 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-1991-010213
  19. Eco, U. (1986). Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Indiana University Press. https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=aqTkkHZsIMwC