Research Article

Research on the Application of Criminal Law to Cross-Border Online Gambling in China

Shousheng LiPeople’s Public Security University of China*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

With the continuous deepening of globalization and the rapid development of internet technology, cross-border online gambling, as an emerging form of crime, has brought new challenges to social security and international cooperation. Based on the current criminal law in China and relevant research, this paper analyzes in depth the characteristics of cross-border online gambling and the loopholes and deficiencies in the current legal system, and puts forward corresponding improvement suggestions. Drawing on existing academic research results at home and abroad, combined with relevant cases in China and legal practices in other countries and regions, this paper believes that in dealing with cross-border online gambling crimes, it is necessary to adhere to legislation first, clarify relevant charges and sentencing standards, and ensure the completeness and applicability of the legal system. At the same time, law enforcement agencies should strengthen cooperation and information sharing, form a joint force to decisively cut off the interest chain of cross-border online gambling. In addition, international cooperation is also an indispensable part, and all countries should make joint efforts to establish an international law enforcement cooperation mechanism to jointly combat cross-border online gambling crimes. Through comprehensive measures and joint efforts, social harmony and stability can be maintained, and the vital interests of the people can be safeguarded.

Keywords: Criminal Law; Online Gambling; Cross-Border Crime; Crime Governance
Published: May 24, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/33/20240059
Volume: CHR Vol.33
pp. 106-115
Download PDF

References

  1. Wei, Z. Y., & Ma, Z. H. (2022). Analysis and investigation countermeasures of new transnational online gambling crimes. Journal of Guangxi Police College, 35(01), 106-112.
  2. Liu, Y. S., & Luo, G. (2023). Research on the criminal law regulation of online gambling crimes. Network Security Technology and Application, 2023(08), 150-152.
  3. Sun, X. L. (2024). Governance dilemmas and countermeasures of transnational online gambling crimes. Network Security Technology and Application, 2024(02), 150-153.
  4. Chen, X. M. (1999). Thoughts and methods of grounded theory. Educational Research and Experiment, 1999(04), 58-63+73.
  5. He, Y. H. (2024). Research on the analysis and countermeasures of transnational online gambling crimes based on grounded theory. Network Security Technology and Application, 2024(02), 147-150.
  6. Wohl, I. (2009). The antigua-united states online gambling dispute. Journal of International Commerce and Economics, 2, 127.
  7. Sytze Kingma, “Gambling and the risk society: the liberalization and legitimation crisis of gambling in the Netherlands” (2004) 4:1 International Gambling Studies 47; Sytze F Kingma, “The liberalization and (re)regulation of Dutch gambling markets: National consequences of the changing European context” (2008) 2:4 Regulation & Governance 445.
  8. Li, X. H., & Liu, J. Y. (2019). Legal system of offshore gambling prohibition. People’s Court Daily, August 30, p. 008.
  9. Littler, A., & Järvinen-Tassopoulos, J. (2018). Online gambling, regulation, and risks: A comparison of gambling policies in Finland and the Netherlands. Journal of Law and Social Policy, 30, 100-126.
  10. Coles, T. (2014). Great Britain introduces a second wave of internet gambling regulation. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 18(1), 37-41.
  11. Andrle, J. D. (2006). A Winning Hand: A Proposal for an International Regulatory Schema with Respect to the Growing Online Gambling Dilemma in the United States. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 10(1). Retrieved from https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/grrj/vol10/iss1/7
  12. Zhao, J. M. (2021). Research on the judicial identification of online gambling crimes (Doctoral dissertation). Inner Mongolia University. DOI:10.27224/d.cnki.gnmdu.2021.000964.
  13. Xu, Y. F. (2018). Characteristics, identification, and improvement of criminal law for online gambling. Social Science Forum, 2018(35), 146.
  14. Ma, K. C. (2000). Evolution of the constituent elements theory. Yue Lu Law Review, 1(00), 167-173.
  15. Wang, H. W. (2023). Criminal charge system and legal application of online gambling crimes. Rule of Law Research, (06), 125-136.
  16. Zeng, Y. X., & Sun, D. L. (2022). Research on the multi-governance path of transnational gambling crimes. Journal of Public Security Studies, 5(04), 35-49+123.
  17. Qian, Y. L., & Li, J. Z. (2021). Analysis of the doctrinal and judicial application of organizing participation in foreign gambling crimes—An evaluation of relevant criminal charges added in the Eleventh Amendment to the Criminal Law. People’s Procuratorial Daily, 2021(17), 1-5.
  18. Guo, Y. D., & Hu, P. (2023). Criminalization evolution, constituent interpretation, and systemic thinking of transnational gambling—From the perspective of the Eleventh Amendment to the Criminal Law and the “Operation Shadow Hunter” case in Macau. Journal of Politics and Law, 40(03), 84-92.
  19. Zhang, T. (2022). Research on criminal law regulation issues of victimless crimes—Taking transnational gambling as an example. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 42(07), 132-143.
  20. China Judgment Document Network. https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=BPnDf6f76e6WAbmbA3Chq4A0V/uz93W44XCXIZ64GaGd6P7okPyGnfUKq3u+IEo43vXmbpXuIXQS4whjuxnc/cHw7iUnaBCA11jetz3a1CIKPeQX1bPvqLTokx+KKXMz
  21. Zhang, M. K. (2021). Denial of judicial interpretation by the Eleventh Amendment to the Criminal Law and its problem resolution. Legal Studies, 2021(02), 3-18.
  22. Li, H. X. (2022). Alienation and regulation: Research on the jurisdictional issues of new types of transnational cyber crimes. Collection of Criminal Law, 69(01), 371-401.