Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.3> Article
Research Article

Analysis of the Meaning of Functional Load for English Pronunciation Teaching at a Cross-Cultural Bilingual University –– Taking Wenzhou-Kean University as an Example

Puning GeCollege of Liberal Arts, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325060*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Wenzhou-Kean University (WKU) is a Sino-American collaborative university where Chinese students communicate in English with professors and peers having diverse English accents. Through such interactions, these students seem to naturally develop an awareness of pronunciation modification. Since pronunciation teaching is not yet emphasized at WKU, this study preliminarily examined if traditional factors affecting functional load (FL), for example, the number of minimal pairs, the difference between consonants and vowels, word frequency, and language context made sense for teaching phonemic contrasts at WKU. At the same time, students’ perceptions of interaction’s effect on pronunciation awareness were assessed. The researcher collected and analyzed attitudinal data from 114 WKU students with different English learning goals. It turned out that emphasizing teaching traditional high FL mistakes, consonant contrasts, and frequently used spoken words might not be necessary at WKU. Instead, through natural interactions in an English as an International Language (EIL) environment, students seemed to have identified important pronunciation mistakes among Chinese learners, tolerated those mistakes not hindering understanding, and practiced perceiving the meaning of accented words through language context.

Keywords: Pronunciation teaching; Interaction; Minimal pairs; Wenzhou-Kean University; Functional load
Published: May 17, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/3/20220240
Volume: CHR Vol.3
pp. 156-168
Download PDF

References

  1. King, R.D.(1967). Functional load and sound change. Language, 43(4), 831‐852. https://doi.org/10.2307/411969
  2. Brown, A.(1988). Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL quarterly, 22(4), 593‐606. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258
  3. Sewell, A. (2021). Functional Load and the Teaching-Learning Relationship in L2 Pronunciation. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 627378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.627378
  4. Ge, P. (2021). Research on Wenzhou-Kean University students’ motivation of accent modification [Unpublished paper]. English Department, Wenzhou-Kean University.
  5. Catford, J. C. (1987). Phonetics and the Teaching of Pronunciation. In J. Morley (Ed.), Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory (pp. 83-100). Washington, DC: TESOL.
  6. Luo, J. (2014). A study of mother tongue interference in pronunciation of college English learning in China. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 4(8), 1702-1706. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.8.1702-1706
  7. Han, F. (2013). Pronunciation problems of Chinese learners of English. ORTESOL Journal, 30, 26-30. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1152473.pdf
  8. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34(4), 520‐531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004
  9. Suzukida, Y., & Saito, K. (2021). Which segmental features matter for successful L2 comprehensibility? Revisiting and generalizing the pedagogical value of the functional load principle. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 431-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819858246
  10. Oh, Y. M., Coupé, C., Marsico, E., & Pellegrino, F. (2015). Bridging phonological system and lexicon: Insights from a corpus study of functional load. Journal of phonetics, 53, 153-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.08.003
  11. Kang, O., & Moran, M. (2014). Functional loads of pronunciation features in nonnative speakers’ oral assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 176-187. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43267954
  12. Wedel, A., Jackson, S., & Kaplan, A. (2013). Functional load and the lexicon: Evidence that syntactic category and frequency relationships in minimal lemma pairs predict the loss of phoneme contrasts in language change. Language and Speech, 56(3), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913489096
  13. Levis, J. & Cortes, V. (2008). Minimal pairs in spoken corpora: Implications for pronunciation assessment and teaching. In C. A. Chapelle, Y. -R. Chung, & J. Xu (Eds.), Towards adaptive CALL: Natural language processing for diagnostic language assessment (pp. 197-208). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
  14. Pennington, M. C. (1998). The teachability of phonology in adulthood: A re-examination. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 323-341. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1998.36.4.323
  15. Isaacs, T. (2009). Integrating form and meaning in L2 pronunciation instruction. TESL Canada Journal, 27(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v27i1.1034
  16. Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of memory and language, 50(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0
  17. Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.
  18. Wells, J. C. (2005). Goals in teaching English pronunciation. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & J. Przedlacka (Eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene (2nd ed., pp. 101-110). Peter Lang.
  19. Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford University Press.
  20. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233-277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
  21. Gosselin, K. M. (2014). Developing an instrument to study the impact of functional load on the perception of spoken English by L2 learners [Master’s thesis plan, University of Minnesota]. Digital Conservancy of University of Minnesota.