Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.28> Article
Research Article

A Quantitative Exploration: Weibo Users’ Perception of Trolling

Shihan XuThe Open University of Harbin* Zihan ChenKings College London Weixiang YuanGuangdong University Of Foreign Studies

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Online trolling has caused multiple concerning social issues within the past decade, thus receiving significantly rising attention from both academia and the public. Nevertheless, not only are there differences when researchers define trolling, but also there is a gap between academic definitions of online trolling and users’ interpretations of online trolling. To this end, this research conducted an online survey and recruited 193 Weibo users to explore how they define online trolling quantitatively, how they perceive trolling behavior, and how online trolling influences them. After analyzing, mainly cross-filtering, the collected data, this research found that Weibo users’ definition of online trolling is considerably broad. Even though most participants had negative emotional responses to being trolled, few experienced behavioral changes. Moreover, senior Weibo users’ trolling intentions are more defensive than those who have been Weibo users for a shorter time.

Keywords: social media; user perception; trolling; definition
Published: April 19, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/28/20230421
Volume: CHR Vol.28
pp. 282-294
Download PDF

References

  1. Huang, K. (2023, March 28). Zheng Linghua: The 23 Years Old Girl with Pink Hair is Gone, but Trolls are Still Here. BBC News (Chinese). https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/chinese-news-65095783
  2. Schwartz, M. (2008, August 3). The trolls among us. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html
  3. Vogels, E. A. (2021, January 13). The State of Online Harassment. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/
  4. Donath J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In Smith M. A., Kollock P. (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29–59). Routledge.
  5. Kim M.-S., Raja N. S. (1991, May 23–27). Verbal aggression and self-disclosure on computer bulletin boards [Paper presented]. 41st Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL, United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED.pdf334620
  6. Hardaker C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(2), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2010.011
  7. Ortiz, S. M. (2020). Trolling as a Collective Form of Harassment: An Inductive Study of How Online Users Understand Trolling. Social Media + Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120928512
  8. Herring S. C. (1999). The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment online. The Information Society, 15(3), 151–167.
  9. Gray K. L. (2012). Deviant bodies, stigmatized identities, and racist acts: Examining the experiences of African-American gamers in Xbox Live. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 18(4), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2012.746740
  10. Gray K. L., Buyukozturk B., Hill Z. G. (2017). Blurring the boundaries: Using Gamergate to examine “real” and symbolic violence against women in contemporary gaming culture. Sociology Compass, 11(3), Article e12458.
  11. Vera-Gray F. (2017). Talk about a cunt with too much idle time: Trolling feminist research. Feminist Review, 115(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0038-y
  12. Buckels E. E., Trapnell P. D., Paulhus D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
  13. Phillips W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. MIT Press.
  14. Sanfilippo M. R., Fichman P., Yang S. (2018). Multidimensionality of online trolling behaviors. The Information Society, 34(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1391911
  15. Golf-Papez, M., & Veer, E. (2017). Don’t feed the trolling: rethinking how online trolling is being defined and combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(15-16), 1336-1354.
  16. March, & Marrington, J. (2019). A Qualitative Analysis of Internet Trolling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 22(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0210
  17. Brubaker, P. J., Montez, D., & Church, S. H. (2021). The Power of Schadenfreude: Predicting Behaviors and Perceptions of Trolling Among Reddit Users. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021382
  18. March, E., & Steele, G. (2020). High esteem and hurting others online: Trait sadism moderates the relationship between self-esteem and internet trolling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(7), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0652
  19. Dahlberg, L. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00137.x
  20. McAloon, J. (2015, September 30). Why do celebrities like Lena Dunham leave Twitter? Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/11537494/Why-do-celebritiesleave-Twitter.html
  21. NetSafe. (2012, February 24). Submission on NZLC IP27: The news media meets “new media”: rights, responsibilities and regulation in the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/fifiles/submissionAttachments/39%20NetSafe.pdf
  22. Berger, J., Sorensen, A. T., & Rasmussen, S. J. (2010). Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Science, 29(5), 815–827. doi:10.1287/mksc.1090.0557
  23. Galov, N. (n.d.). 19+ Weibo Statistics: Is it bigger than twitter in 2023?. WebTribunal. https://webtribunal.net/blog/weibo-statistics/#gref
  24. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. SAGE.
  25. Li, K. (2021). Government Work Report. https://www.gov.cn/zhuanti/2021lhzfgzbg/index.htm
  26. Hong, F.-Y., & Cheng, K.-T. (2018). Correlation between university students’ online trolling behavior and online trolling victimization forms, current conditions, and personality traits. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.016
  27. Fichman, P., & McClelland, M. W. (2020). The impact of gender and political affiliation on trolling. First Monday, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i1.11061
  28. Akhtar, S., & Morrison, C. M. (2019). The prevalence and impact of online trolling of UK members of Parliament. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.015
  29. Mihaylov, T., Koychev, I., Georgiev, G., & Nakov, P. (2021). Exposing paid opinion manipulation trolls. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.13726.